Saturday, June 30, 2007

UK Terror Attacks


This shot was taken by someone at Glasgow Airport and posted, along with pictures from other travellers caught-up in the attack, on the BBC web site. These pictures convey what was going on as well as anything from CNN could, and they were being posted within minutes of the crash thanks to cell phones and high-speed networks. The democratisation of photography that the digital revolution has brought us is an unstoppable force, and in my view it's a force for good.
However, that basic right to take pictures in a public place is going to increasingly become curtailed. As Mike over at The Online Photographer highlighted, NYC is proposing to limit what kinds of photography will be allowed in public places, and how long can be spent preparing and shooting both video and still shots.
This is all being done in the name of preventing terror attacks, of course, but no one can explain quite how that will work. Do we have any evidence that video or still images have contributed to such attacks? Have any attacks been foiled because the authorities have caught & prosecuted prospective terrorists apprehended while on a reconnaissance mission? And if you think this is indeed a logical step that will make us all safer, what about other, equally valid moves that must also then be taken such as banning cell phone use in public in case the perpetrators are calling in situation reports, or there's a phone-based trigger device (as appears to be the case in London) primed and ready to go?
Knee-jerk legislation, the application of which will inevitably be left to interpretation by local police, is not the way to make a difference here. As London has decided, and rightly so in my view, you are much better off installing your own video surveillance equipment and allowing people to go about their daily business unencumbered.
Banning private citizens from using cameras won't stop anyone from undertaking these attacks; allowing us all to take pictures at any time, might, though, help to capture both the incident itself and the perpetrators.

Friday, June 29, 2007

iPhone - Not My Phone


No, I don't have one. No, I'm not lining up for days on end to be amongst the first owners. And no, despite being smack in the middle of Silicon Valley, I don't in fact plan on getting one any time soon. Here's why:

1) $600 is too much for the release 1.0 features announced so far. ($900 + on eBay)

2) It will be buggy: newly integrated software stacks always are.

3) One of it's strengths is that it can act as a platform for other Safari browser-based applets; one of it's weaknesses is that few yet exist. Though I think this ultimately will prove to be it's strongest suit, I'd rather wait a while to see what plays out here.

4) Cingular is the exclusive service provider for this thing, and that's not an option for where I live. (GSM networks have less coverage here than CDMA ones.) Furthermore, Cingular has about the worst data rates in the USA with their EDGE network that the phone will fall back to if it can't find an open Wi Fi network for internet access.

5) I already have two phones, and don't need any more plans, devices, numbers or bloody chargers to lug around.

6) It's a bit big for a phone, a bit small for a pocket PC, a bit pricey for a PDA.

7) While the gesture-based UI looks to be innovative and appealing for some functions, still not clear to me how well this touch-screen with "fingers only" will work for basic things like typing e-mail messages etc.. TBD, I guess.


Kudos to Apple though: the fact that (a) they must have got one sweetheart deal out of Cingular for exclusivity almost guarantees that they are going to coin it regardless of how this all plays out; (b) the scheme whereby you *have* to have an iTunes account in order to unlock the thing is a stroke of genius; and (c) the saturation media coverage seen over the past days has been largely free and gratis, courtesy of the 4th estate.


Hit or miss, Apple wins.

The Terminator's Musical Box?

Frankenstein meets Jean Michel Jarre? However you classify it, seems from the video that this is one instrument you want to see "live". Hard to describe this thing except by sticking to the facts: it's a solid-state Tesla coil generating long, high-voltage sparks modulated to create musical notes.

Probably won't be featuring as a prop for a pub band near you anytime soon but I bet it will show up at some heavy metal thrash in the not too distant future.

Enjoy. I found it oddly compelling.

Thursday, June 28, 2007

Paris Liberated - So How Was It For You?

Anyone watch the interview with the newly-released PH last night on Larry King? Nope, me neither. I was at a (free - kind of) Sheryl Crow concert, courtesy of Freescale, at the Hard Rock Cafe in Universal Studios. (I did say we geeks know how to party, right?) However, I did just see a couple of highlights and wished I'd recorded it, if for no other reason than to help me get to sleep tonight.

Larry King had to keep finishing her sentences; she denied ever taking drugs (yeah, right); her favourite bible passage was "don't have one"; yes, she was strip-searched; and overall the whole experience was "gross". She claimed to have read to pass the time (hard to believe) and to have written down her thoughts (laughable).

Oh, and she overcame her claustrophobia in the second stint in the pokey by "talking to herself". Bet that was a thrilling externalised Socratic dialogue .....

Please, oh powerful TV gods, can we now have her sink into total obscurity?? Please?

Monster Golf Drive


Now this is what I call a concept car! To quote from evo magazine, "it has a 6 litre, twin-turbo W12 engine mounted where the rear seats should be, sending 641 bhp (650 ps) to the rear wheels. ... It's claimed the uber-Golf will hit 62 mph in just 3.7 secs and go to an equally supercar-like (and fairly scary) 201.8 mph."
Judging by the ground clearance shown in the above picture, though, the first speed bump or steeply graded car park exit you meet would be both expensive and deeply disturbing, both to you and to the front splitter and what look like 22 inch rims with rubber bands wound round them.
Gotta' love them Germans - wunderbah job, guys.

Fancy Hotel Syndrome


Why is it that "high-end" properties in everyday hotel chains try to emulate the splendour of a Roman villa or the style of a French chateau? Without fail, they get it wrong. Ornate fast bleeds into excess, style into schmaltz.

Please, Marriott, give up. Develop a look that better fits the 21st century. Bin the swagged curtains and ugly patterned carpets. Lose the overblown furnishings and wood panelling. And above all, please junk the spewing flamingos. We thank you. And yes, this is a theme I'll be returning to ....

I Wins Again


Yes, it was Mika Salo's GT2 Ferrari 430, shown here at the Freescale Technical Forum.

Who said us geeks don't know how to party?!

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Photo Quiz 3


Your assignment, should you choose to accept it, is to name the principal driver of the above car! And yes, it is a Ferrari. There are some clues in the picture and also clues in other posts about where I am.

Enjoy! (My money is on "I" to clean-sweep #3 because he has some inside knowledge, but we'll see!)

Answer in a couple of days.

Monday, June 25, 2007

Bomb Scare In The Air

Yup, I was on that United flight diverted because of a “suspicious device”. And here’s the secret that wasn’t revealed on the 6 o’clock news – it was a broken calculator. I know, because the bloke that found it was in the window seat next to where I was sitting.

First off, United began the day swimmingly by posting that the departure of UA292, SFO to MCO (Orlando) would be about 35 minutes late because the in-bound was held up somewhere. Alas, they subsequently forgot to mention in the Red Carpet club that,rather than hanging around waiting for it to show, United had instead found another 757 stuck down the back of the sofa and given us that one to play with. Just by luck I happened by the monitors and saw that the departure time had been set back to 2:51 pm again. Excellent – just time to collect my stuff up and head off, arriving at the gate right as it was boarding.

Some 10 minutes after I had sat down, the guy in the window seat shows up all hot and sweaty, as no one had told him either that it was back on track and now leaving on time. Anyway, some 35 minutes late (so yes, we were now leaving when the original, delayed plane was supposed to) we were ready to take off.

A few minutes after we were airborne, man-in-window-seat (MIWS) asks me if I have a screwdriver about my person. Well, actually, no, being as how TSA tends to frown on such things these days. He then shows me something he found in the seat pocket in front of him. I take a look, and it was a small, thin calculator with a diary function included, but one that clearly wasn’t working anymore. He took it back, stared at it for a bit and then called the stewardess. At this point, I knew we were screwed; even more so when he explained what he had found as follows: “Excuse me, but I found this in the seat pocket. None of the buttons work, it’s set to the wrong date and the back’s scuffed-up.” Nice going, Sherlock.

Stewardess trots off towards the pointy end of the plane and returns a couple of minutes later to re-check his story, and presumably to see if he’d donned a turban and grown a beard. Finding nothing amiss with Mr. MIWS, off she trots once more, and then comes back and restarts the drinks service. Could sanity prevail? Hell no.

Next up, some bloke in an embroidered shirt and a fashionable beard shows up and starts the questioning thing all over again on Mr. MIWS. Where did you find it? Who are you? Who are you travelling with? He was clearly one of the air marshals that now travel the friendly skies on a regular basis, and for once actually found something to do.

Things drag on for a bit, and then the real fun begins. The video system is shutdown and the stewardesses all run around collecting headphones and blankets like, well, like they were suddenly worth something for a start. One then came on the intercom and started waffling about “certain procedures” and “we’ll get through this with teamwork”, the latter phrase which she then repeats multiple times over the next ten minutes. (By the time we landed she seemed almost on the verge of hysteria, her voice starting to crack.)

Next up, the cleared the back four rows and made the displaced passengers sit in rows further forward. “OK”, you may say, “so what?” Well, alas, the flight was full and so they had to perch in between existing passengers, almost none of which had the faintest idea why this was happening. Indeed, all this time there was no information of any short except the same phrases getting repeated time and time again. Meanwhile, the now “suspicious device” is all wrapped and cozy inside a heap of blankets and securely bound by yes, you guessed it, headphone cords.

We land, and the pilot comes on and says there’s this security thing and how we should sit there and wait for a nice man to come on the plane and tell us what to do. Fair ‘nuff. But you have to wonder why, if they felt this was serious enough to divert us to Denver airport, and in very short order at that, they were then OK with parking the plane at a normal gate in the B terminal, right between two other aircraft, and surrounded by terminal buildings, fuel trucks and ground staff?

The entire plane then disembarked into buses and we were told we had the fun of being re-screened again but then to head back to the departure gate. Fine, except no one told the security people at airport screening, so they wouldn’t let us through to be scanned because, surprise, surprise, no one had a boarding pass! After another 15 minutes someone more senior than the janitor’s dog showed up and we were allowed to move on through the process. Long story short, we re-boarded a flight that was now 4 hours late and due to arrive into Orlando at 3 am.

Once seated, they reassured us that the plane had been searched by the FBI and TSA, and then the “aisles, seats and overhead bins had been checked by a bomb-sniffing dog”. Blimey. That was either a giant dog whose head was 6 feet from the ground and could reach high enough to do that, or it was some kind of midget breed that they could bung into each bin to check it out by scampering around. The things the Feds have at their disposal that we can only dream of….

Having handled the “device” in question then to me it was over-reaction, but that doesn’t mean I was surprised by the response. However, what did depress me was the total lack of information supplied on what was *actually* happening at any point in this whole production, with instead meaningless phrases being substituted for us all being treated like adults. And that, to my way of thinking, is unacceptable.

Sunday, June 24, 2007

Orlando, sans Disney


In-Flight Catering, United Airlines

On the road again, this time heading to Florida for a tradeshow. Of course, my United outbound is already showing a delay, and being Sunday I can well believe that SFO will be heaving. Thankfully, I think the hotel that's being used as the venue is quite a way from the nearest Disney property - itself quite a feat in Florida - so I should avoid getting too caught up with any of that traffic once there.


Forecast? 93 degrees, humidity climbing and cloudy. I'm not going to like this ...